STATE OF WISCONSIN
Optometry Examining Board
IN THE MATTER OF RULE-MAKING PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE
OPTOMETRY EXAMINING BOARD
ORDER OF THE OPTOMETRY EXAMINING BOARD
ADOPTING RULES
(CLEARINGHOUSE RULE 15-079)
ORDER
An order of the Optometry Examining Board to repeal ch. Opt 2 relating to organization of the board. Analysis prepared by the Department of Safety and Professional Services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANALYSIS
Explanation of agency authority:
Under 15.08(5)(b), Stats, each examining board shall promulgate rules for its own guidance and for the guidance of the trade or profession to which it pertains, and define and enforce professional conduct and unethical practices not inconsistent with the law relating to the particular trade or profession.
Related statute or rule: N/A
Plain language analysis:
Section 1 repeals chapter Opt 2. Chapter Opt 2 was repealed and recreated in 1971. These rules for governing the board are now duplicative or obsolete. The statutes provide for frequency of meetings. The Board does not follow the latest copyright of Robert’s Rules while conducting business. The board, specifically the secretary of the board, does not receive the voucher for membership in the international association of boards. The Board may send a delegate to a meeting without specifying in rule and the statute.
Summary of, and comparison with, existing or proposed federal regulation: None
Comparison with rules in adjacent states:
Illinois: Conduct of business or parliamentary procedure is not addressed in statutes or rules. Membership in associations is not addressed in statutes or rules.
Iowa: Conduct of business or parliamentary procedure is not addressed in statutes or rules. Iowa statutes allow each board to maintain a membership in the national organization of the regulatory boards of its profession to be paid from board funds.
Michigan: Conduct of business or parliamentary procedure is not addressed in statutes or rules.Membership in associations is not addressed in statutes or rules.
Minnesota: Conduct of business or parliamentary procedure is not addressed in statutes or rules.Membership in associations is not addressed in statutes or rules.
Summary of factual data and analytical methodologies:
In reviewing the rules, the Board determined this chapter is obsolete or duplicative. The chapter was created in 1971.
Analysis and supporting documents used to determine effect on small business or in preparation of economic impact analysis:
The rule was posted for economic comments and none were received. This rule only impacts the operation of the Board and does not have any economic effect.
Fiscal Estimate and Economic Impact Analysis:
